Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 May 20266005408

Rear of 12 Park Road, South Norwood, SE25 6LA

erection of new building comprising 3 residential units (1 x 3 bed, 2 x 1 bed)

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 10 Park Road and 1 Upper Grove, with particular regard to outlook and light
  • whether the proposed scheme would make appropriate provision for parking and sustainable transport initiatives

What decided it

The cumulative effect of harm to character and appearance, harm to neighbouring living conditions through loss of outlook, and failure to secure sustainable transport provision outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and biodiversity net gain.

The planning harms of character and appearance impact, loss of outlook to neighbours, and failure to secure sustainable transport provision attracted considerable weight and were not outweighed by the limited weight given to housing delivery and biodiversity net gain.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy SP4 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policy SP8 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policy DM29 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policy DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018

Judgments cited: Whiteside v the Council of the London Borough of Croydon [2022] EWHC 3318

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.