Planning appeal decision
Fish, Cathedral Street, London, SE1 9AL
Planning appeal 6005412 at Fish, Cathedral Street, London, SE1 9AL (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 12 August 2026 by Inspector N Praine, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character or appearance of the area including the setting and significance of designated heritage assets.
the removal of existing umbrellas and glass screens to outdoor seating area and installation of new canopy structure over outdoor seating area with openable elevations
- Authority
- London Borough of Southwark
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Inspector
- N Praine
- Postcode
- SE1 9AL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the character or appearance of the area including the setting and significance of designated heritage assets
What decided it
The less than substantial but considerable heritage harm to the Conservation Area and locally listed building, arising from the proposal's failure to respond positively to existing architectural character and its diminution of the sense of space within the historic market environment, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits identified.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets was weighed against the public benefits of improved accessibility, economic activity, and customer experience; the heritage harm outweighed these benefits, which carried only limited to moderate weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P13Policy P14Policy P20Policy P26Policy D4Policy HC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Southwark
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed20 October 20266010489269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
- Dismissed30 September 202660018595 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
- Dismissed29 September 20266003226Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
- Dismissed16 September 20266012237123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
- Dismissed17 August 20266007608134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®