Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20266005412

Fish, Cathedral Street, London, SE1 9AL

Planning appeal 6005412 at Fish, Cathedral Street, London, SE1 9AL (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 12 August 2026 by Inspector N Praine, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character or appearance of the area including the setting and significance of designated heritage assets.

the removal of existing umbrellas and glass screens to outdoor seating area and installation of new canopy structure over outdoor seating area with openable elevations

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
leisure-sport
Inspector
N Praine
Postcode
SE1 9AL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character or appearance of the area including the setting and significance of designated heritage assets

What decided it

The less than substantial but considerable heritage harm to the Conservation Area and locally listed building, arising from the proposal's failure to respond positively to existing architectural character and its diminution of the sense of space within the historic market environment, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits identified.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets was weighed against the public benefits of improved accessibility, economic activity, and customer experience; the heritage harm outweighed these benefits, which carried only limited to moderate weight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P13Policy P14Policy P20Policy P26Policy D4Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

647 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed20 October 20266010489
    269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266001859
    5 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266003226
    Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266012237
    123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266007608
    134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.