Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 June 20266005415

26 Haley St, Short Heath, Willenhall, WV12 4JT

Planning appeal 6005415 at 26 Haley St, Short Heath, Willenhall, WV12 4JT (Walsall) was dismissed on 2 June 2026 by Inspector Jonathan Edwards, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

detached 5-bedroom house

Authority
Walsall
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Jonathan Edwards
Postcode
WV12 4JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • its effect on living conditions at 9 Mill Lane with regards to outlook
  • whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future residents in terms of privacy
  • whether it would provide a satisfactory access for fire appliances

What decided it

The considerable weight attached to the design shortcomings and harm to character, appearance and neighbouring amenity, in accordance with paragraphs 135 and 139 of the Framework, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and other modest benefits.

The adverse effects of the development, particularly the harm to character and appearance and to neighbouring living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme including housing delivery, energy efficiency, accessibility and efficient use of urban land.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
UDP policy GP2UDP policy ENV32BCCS policy CSP4BCCS policy ENV2BCCS policy ENV3BCCS policy HOUS2SAD policy HC2SPD policy DW3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 135Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

40 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Walsall

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266008716
    Rooftop Food Court, Multi-Storey Car Park, George St, Walsall, Ws1 1RS
  2. Dismissed9 October 20266012207
    Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
  3. Allowed8 October 20266012149
    225, Lichfield Road, Rushall, WS4 1EA
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266013877
    57, Lincoln Road, Walsall, WS1 2DW
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266008378
    407 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.