Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 July 20266005624

333 Harlesden Road, London, NW10 3RX

demolition of side extension and erection of two storey side extension and rear roof extension to existing HMO to create an additional 5 HMO bedrooms and landscaping

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
NW10 3RX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitably located to accommodate the proposed development, having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan and access to services and sustainable transport
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers
  • whether the proposed development would make appropriate provision for urban greening

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole on three main issues—locational suitability, character and appearance, and living conditions—and no material considerations indicate a decision should be made other than in accordance with the plan.

The limited benefit of additional HMO accommodation without loss of self-contained housing did not outweigh the harm identified through conflicts with the development plan relating to locational suitability, character and appearance, and living conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy BH7, Policy BD1, Policy DMP1, Policy D6, Policy BH4, Policy BGI1, Policy G5, Policy G6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.