Planning appeal decision
Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN
Planning appeal 6005638 at Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 5 August 2026 by Inspector C Walker, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the Council's housing strategy.
Outline Planning Application (Access to be considered, all other matters reserved) - Erection of 18 no. dwellings (including 12 no. affordable units and public open space)
- Authority
- Babergh District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- C Walker
- Postcode
- IP9 2DN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the Council's housing strategy
- whether the effects of the development make it necessary to secure financial contributions towards local infrastructure
- the effect of the development on the integrity of European habitat sites
- whether a development of the quantum proposed is capable of appropriately responding to the character of the area
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate a robust viability case for the market housing element, the absence of a legal agreement to secure affordable housing delivery, the lack of secured infrastructure contributions, and the unmitigated adverse effect on European habitat sites collectively rendered the proposal unsustainable and in conflict with the development plan.
The benefits of housing supply, social and economic benefits, and biodiversity net gain were outweighed by the unsustainable departure from the development plan without proper justification, the inability to secure affordable housing for local needs, unmitigated infrastructure impacts, and likely significant effects on the integrity of European designated habitat sites, to which great weight was afforded.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- JLP Policy SP03BNP Policy BEN1JLP Policy LP07JLP Policy SP02JLP Policies LP30JLP Policies LP32BNP Policy BEN19JLP Policies SP09JLP Policies LP16BNP Policies BEN8BNP Policies BEN9JLP Policies LP24BNP Policies BEN3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 76Paragraph 58Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Babergh District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed7 October 20266011354Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
- Allowed16 September 2026601358357 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
- Dismissed16 September 2026601138434 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
- Allowed7 August 20266007359Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
- Dismissed23 July 20266003689St Bartholomews Priory, St Bartholomews Lane, Sudbury, CO10 1XP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®