Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20266006126

12 Coomb Street, London, N1 8DJ

Planning appeal 6006126 at 12 Coomb Street, London, N1 8DJ (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 10 June 2026 by Inspector Simon J Cater, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area.

Change from front lower basement window to timber framed French doors; first floor rear extension above existing rear projection

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Simon J Cater
Postcode
N1 8DJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed rear extension would materially depart from the established pattern of subordinate rear projections, appearing as a visually dominant and discordant addition that would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area with no public benefits to justify this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy PLAN1 of the Islington Strategic and Development Management Policies 2023Policy DH1 of the Islington Strategic and Development Management Policies 2023Policy DH2 of the Islington Strategic and Development Management Policies 2023

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 796 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.