Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 May 20266006493

Eylesden Hall, Chart Road, Chart Sutton, Kent, ME17 3RF

described on the planning application form as “New roof-level dormer to the side elevation, two new roof dormer windows to the rear elevation, the replacement and enlargement of windows and associated landscape works

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Evans M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)

What decided it

The proposed dormer addition would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the non-designated heritage asset by unduly domesticating the former school hall and detracting from its architectural and historic significance, which cannot be justified by the modest economic benefits or more efficient use of the site.

Framework references: 125

Plan policies cited: ENV1, LPRSP14(B), LPRSP15, LPRHOU11, LPRQD4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.