Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20266006552

Copse Manor Farm (Street Record), Paley Street, Maidenhead, SL6 3JS

Planning appeal 6006552 at Copse Manor Farm (Street Record), Paley Street, Maidenhead, SL6 3JS (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 9 July 2026 by Inspector Stuart Willis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas at lower risk of flooding and whether the sequential test has been met.

erection of 4 self-build and 2 "market" houses

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Stuart Willis
Postcode
SL6 3JS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas at lower risk of flooding and whether the sequential test has been met
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for biodiversity net gain
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the proposed development would make appropriate provision for carbon offsetting and climate change mitigation
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and loss of openness, combined with significant harm to biodiversity and small harm regarding flood risk, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and other considerations, meaning very special circumstances do not exist.

The benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision, economic and social benefits, and climate change mitigation measures were outweighed by the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and loss of openness, significant harm to biodiversity, and small harm regarding flood risk, with the balance tipping decisively against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NR1Policy QP5Policy SP1Policy NR2Policy NR3Policy HO3Policy SP2Policy EP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

40 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266008337
    4 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
  4. Dismissed4 September 20266009260
    2 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
  5. Notice upheld10 August 20263369085
    Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.