Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20266006552

Copse Manor Farm (Street Record), Paley Street, Maidenhead, SL6 3JS

erection of 4 self-build and 2 "market" houses

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SL6 3JS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas at lower risk of flooding and whether the sequential test has been met
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
  • Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for biodiversity net gain
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the proposed development would make appropriate provision for carbon offsetting and climate change mitigation
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and loss of openness, combined with significant harm to biodiversity and small harm regarding flood risk, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and other considerations, meaning very special circumstances do not exist.

The benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision, economic and social benefits, and climate change mitigation measures were outweighed by the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and loss of openness, significant harm to biodiversity, and small harm regarding flood risk, with the balance tipping decisively against the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 110, 115, 143, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy NR1, Policy QP5, Policy SP1, Policy NR2, Policy NR3, Policy HO3, Policy SP2, Policy EP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.