Planning appeal decision
Rhode Farm, Seed Road, Otterden, ME9 0NN
described in the application form as ‘erection of an agricultural dwelling with associated garden and parking
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural
- Postcode
- ME9 0NN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker at the appeal site
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the countryside, including the Kent Downs National Landscape
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate an essential functional need for a rural worker to live permanently on the holding, meaning the proposal did not meet the exceptional circumstances required by Policy LPRCD3 or paragraph 84(a) of the Framework.
moderate positive weight from housing contribution, economic construction benefits and biodiversity net gain was outweighed by the significant weight attached to the harm arising from siting an unjustified dwelling in an unsustainable location, so the appeal was dismissed
Framework references: 84, 57, 189, 11
Plan policies cited: LPRCD3, LPRSP9, LPRSP15, LPRQD4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®