®Planning appeal decision
Footpath Outside, 45–46 Chalk Farm Road, Chalk Farm, London, NW1 8AJ
Planning appeal 6007364 at Footpath Outside, 45–46 Chalk Farm Road, Chalk Farm, London, NW1 8AJ (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 10 September 2026 by Inspector David Troy, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of Regent's Canal Conservation Area and the Grade II* listed Stable Yard.
Installation of 1 No. BT Street Hub Unit and Associated Advertisement Panels to either Side of the Unit
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- advert · Commercial advertisement
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- telecoms
- Inspector
- David Troy
- Postcode
- NW1 8AJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of Regent's Canal Conservation Area and the Grade II* listed Stable Yard
- highway safety
- community safety and security
- the effect of the proposed advertisements on the amenity of the area, having regard to heritage assets
What decided it
The unacceptable harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of designated heritage assets, combined with adverse effects on highway safety and pedestrian movement, outweighed the modest public benefits of improved telecommunications infrastructure.
the modest public benefits of telecommunications infrastructure improvements were insufficient to offset the substantial harm to character, appearance and heritage setting, and the harmful effects on highway safety and pedestrian movement
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy D2Policy D4Policy G1Policy A1Policy C6Policy T1Policy C5Camden Local Plan 2017
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed12 October 20266007435Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
- Allowed12 October 20266007299Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
- Dismissed10 September 20266010353Footpath Outside 3 Millbrook Place, London, NW1 2JA
- Dismissed10 September 20266010352Footpath Outside 3 Millbrook Place, London, NW1 2JA
- Dismissed10 September 20266007600Footpath Outside 9 - 17 Highgate Road, London, NW5 1JY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.