Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 October 20266007518

Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

Planning appeal 6007518 at Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 13 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for residential development when having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities.

erection of 1 self-build bungalow

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
RH6 9JP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for residential development when having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt

What decided it

The proposal would fail to comply with national decision-making policy TR3 as it would not be located in a safe and sustainable location in transport terms, and the limited benefits of the scheme would be substantially outweighed by this adverse effect.

Applying Policy S5, the benefits of approving the proposal—redevelopment of previously developed land, contribution to housing land supply shortfall, self-build status and construction-phase economic benefits—would be substantially outweighed by the adverse effects of locating the development in an unsustainable location lacking safe and suitable transport access.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP5Policy DP10Policy DP13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

38 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266008688
    Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
  4. Dismissed22 September 20266011736
    Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
  5. Dismissed18 September 20266011972
    Semper Fidelis, Witre Mill Lane, Newchapel, RH7 6HJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.