Planning appeal decision
Land at Foxley Orchard, Ascot Road, Holyport, SL6 3LD
Planning appeal 6007540 at Land at Foxley Orchard, Ascot Road, Holyport, SL6 3LD (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 14 July 2026 by Inspector D Marley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether policies in the National Planning Policy Framework related to areas at risk of flooding provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the proposed development.
permission in principle for the removal of the existing tennis court and the erection of a single self build dwelling
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- D Marley
- Postcode
- SL6 3LD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether policies in the National Planning Policy Framework related to areas at risk of flooding provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the proposed development
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- if the proposal is found to be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The surface water flood risk at the site access, which would require future occupiers to transit through flood waters in severe rainfall events, provides a strong reason for refusing the development under Framework flood risk policies, and the substantial harm to Green Belt openness cannot be clearly outweighed by housing need and self-build benefits.
The significant positive weight afforded to housing need, self-build provision, and associated economic benefits does not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to harm to Green Belt openness and the significant weight given to conflict with Framework flood risk policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy NR1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 11diParagraph 11dParagraph 143Paragraph 154gParagraph 155Paragraph 175
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed23 September 202660083374 Whurley Way, Maidenhead, SL6 7SS
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®