Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 August 20266007703

Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

Planning appeal 6007703 at Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 3 August 2026 by Inspector J Bowyer, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the loss of commercial moorings would be acceptable having regard to effects on employment and relevant provisions of the development plan.

change of use of part of the existing pontoon for 3nos. residential moorings and 1no. mooring for short term let

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
J Bowyer
Postcode
KT1 1HN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the loss of commercial moorings would be acceptable having regard to effects on employment and relevant provisions of the development plan
  • The effect of the proposal on capacity for waterborne passenger and tourist traffic
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the significance of heritage assets
  • Whether there would be acceptable provision for cycle storage and waste storage and collection
  • Whether arrangements for vehicle parking would be adequate having regard to the requirements of the development plan
  • Whether the proposal would be in an acceptable location having regard to flood risk
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers

What decided it

The cumulative adverse impacts of the loss of commercial moorings without adequate justification, unacceptable reduction in waterborne passenger and tourist traffic capacity, and failure to provide adequate parking, cycle storage and waste facilities significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of providing three residential moorings.

The provision of residential moorings in the context of a housing supply shortfall and modest tourism benefits were outweighed by the significant shortcomings in employment justification, loss of tourism capacity, and inadequate provision for sustainable transport and waste management, resulting in cumulative adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM 17 of the Core Strategy 2012Policy DM 7 of the Core Strategy 2012Policy DM 12 of the Core Strategy 2012Policy DM 10 of the Core Strategy 2012Policy DM 4 of the Core Strategy 2012Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 12 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 15 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 16 of the London Plan 2021Policy SI 17 of the London Plan 2021Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan 2008
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

374 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009988
    56 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266009076
    74 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010924
    271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
  5. Allowed27 July 20266003775
    12 Hardman Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 6RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.