Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 August 20266007703

Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

change of use of part of the existing pontoon for 3nos. residential moorings and 1no. mooring for short term let

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
KT1 1HN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the loss of commercial moorings would be acceptable having regard to effects on employment and relevant provisions of the development plan
  • The effect of the proposal on capacity for waterborne passenger and tourist traffic
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the significance of heritage assets
  • Whether there would be acceptable provision for cycle storage and waste storage and collection
  • Whether arrangements for vehicle parking would be adequate having regard to the requirements of the development plan
  • Whether the proposal would be in an acceptable location having regard to flood risk
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers

What decided it

The cumulative adverse impacts of the loss of commercial moorings without adequate justification, unacceptable reduction in waterborne passenger and tourist traffic capacity, and failure to provide adequate parking, cycle storage and waste facilities significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of providing three residential moorings.

The provision of residential moorings in the context of a housing supply shortfall and modest tourism benefits were outweighed by the significant shortcomings in employment justification, loss of tourism capacity, and inadequate provision for sustainable transport and waste management, resulting in cumulative adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM 17 of the Core Strategy 2012, Policy DM 7 of the Core Strategy 2012, Policy DM 12 of the Core Strategy 2012, Policy DM 10 of the Core Strategy 2012, Policy DM 4 of the Core Strategy 2012, Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy SI 12 of the London Plan 2021, Policy SI 15 of the London Plan 2021, Policy SI 16 of the London Plan 2021, Policy SI 17 of the London Plan 2021, Kingston Town Centre Area Action Plan 2008

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.