Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 July 20266007734

Pavement O/S 166 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0LA

Planning appeal 6007734 at Pavement O/S 166 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0LA (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 29 July 2026 by Inspector R Gravett, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Albert Square and the Stockwell Park Conservation Area, and nearby listed buildings.

the installation of 1no. BT Street Hub and removal of 3no. associated BT payphones

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
telecoms
Inspector
R Gravett
Postcode
SW9 0LA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Albert Square and the Stockwell Park Conservation Area, and nearby listed buildings
  • highway and pedestrian safety
  • the effect of the proposed advertisements on the visual amenity of the area, and on public safety

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation areas and listed building setting, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, which could potentially be delivered in alternative forms or locations.

the less than substantial harm to the conservation areas and listed building setting, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LLP Policy T9LLP Policy Q5LLP Policy Q6LLP Policy Q17LLP Policy Q20LLP Policy Q22LLP Policy Q23LP Policy T4LP Policy D3LP Policy D8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 119Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

690 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed14 August 20266010147
    Albert Embankment, Outside No. 64, London, SE1 7TP
  2. Allowed14 August 20266010145
    Albert Embankment, Outside No. 64, London, SE1 7TP
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266006141
    Pavement O/S Lidl, 189 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0QE
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266006137
    Pavement O/S Lidl, 189 Clapham Road, London, SW9 0QE
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266008952
    Outside No 147 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1XN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.