Planning appeal decision
Pavement Outside 111 Southgate Road, London, N1 3JS
Planning appeal 6007850 at Pavement Outside 111 Southgate Road, London, N1 3JS (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 3 July 2026 by Inspector Les Greenwood, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area, including in respect of visual amenity.
the installation of one JOLT Unit (Electric Vehicle Charge Point, with integral double-sided LCD screen) and associated electrical connection works
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- utilities-energy
- Inspector
- Les Greenwood
- Postcode
- N1 3JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area, including in respect of visual amenity
- The effect of the proposal on the safety of public highway users
What decided it
The combination of harm to the conservation area's character and appearance and the prejudice to public highway user safety could not be justified by the environmental and economic benefits of the single installation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- The London Plan policy D3The London Plan policy D4The London Plan policy HC1The London Plan policy T2The London Plan policy T4The London Plan policy T6Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies PLAN1Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies DH1Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies DH2Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies DH6Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies T1Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies T2Islington Local Plan Strategic and Development Management Policies T4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Islington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed22 October 20266006605131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
- Allowed16 October 2026600593030 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
- Allowed24 September 20266005904Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
- Dismissed24 September 202660055902 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
- Notice upheld23 September 20263364241First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®