Planning appeal decision
The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
Planning appeal 6007949 at The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU (Richmond upon Thames) was dismissed on 6 August 2026 by Inspector Stuart Willis, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of floodlights
- Authority
- Richmond upon Thames
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Inspector
- Stuart Willis
- Postcode
- TW11 9NU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby occupiers with particular regard to outlook and light
- The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including heritage assets
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in Metropolitan Open Land that would erode openness and harm heritage assets, and the public benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances.
The substantial weight given to harm from inappropriateness in MOL, moderate weight to biodiversity harm, moderate weight to living conditions harm, and considerable weight to heritage harm were not outweighed by the modest weight given to sporting and leisure benefits and small weight to economic benefits, so the balance tipped decisively against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP35Policy 39Policy 43Policy 46Policy 53Policy 28Policy 29Policy 30London Plan Policy HC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Split Decision10 March 20263333609Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
- Allowed27 January 20266001465The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
- Dismissed21 August 2024334571957 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT
- Dismissed2 August 202433314813 Broom Road, Teddington, TW11 9NR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®