Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 July 20266007965

1 Wood Vale, London, SE23 3DS

Planning appeal 6007965 at 1 Wood Vale, London, SE23 3DS (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 10 July 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

the demolition of an existing single storey dwellinghouse (use class C3), construction of a three-storey block of flats (with an additional lower ground floor) comprising four self-contained flats (use class C3), and associated works including landscaping, cycle parking and refuse storage

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
A Wright
Postcode
SE23 3DS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of communal amenity space
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing, taking into account the financial viability of the scheme

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and provide inadequate communal amenity space for future occupiers, which together constitute material planning harms that outweigh the limited benefits of housing delivery and biodiversity net gain.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 London Plan 2021Policy D4 London Plan 2021Policy P13 Southwark Plan 2019-2036Policy P14 Southwark Plan 2019-2036Policy P15 Southwark Plan 2019-2036Policy P1 Southwark Plan 2019-2036

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

323 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed20 October 20266010489
    269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266001859
    5 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266003226
    Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266012237
    123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266007608
    134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.