Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 August 20266008087

Nine Oaks, Stock Lane, Over Peover, Knutsford, WA16 8TU

Authority
Cheshire East Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WA16 8TU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies and its effect on openness
  • the effect of the proposal on a protected priority species, in particular bats
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would constitute disproportionate and inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm to openness, and the neutral visual effect from partial demolition does not amount to very special circumstances to overcome this harm.

The substantial harm caused by inappropriateness and harm to Green Belt openness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations; the neutral effect from demolition of part of the existing dwelling did not amount to very special circumstances.

Framework references: GB7, 19

Plan policies cited: Policy PG 3, Policy RUR 11, Policy SE 3, Policy ENV 2

Judgments cited: Morge v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.