Planning appeal decision
Outside No. 608, Holloway Road, London, N19 3PB
Planning appeal 6008154 at Outside No. 608, Holloway Road, London, N19 3PB (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 4 September 2026 by Inspector N Teasdale, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Mercers Road/Tavistock Terrace Conservation Area.
Installation of a Street Hub 3 unit to replace an existing telephone kiosk, providing free public Wi-Fi, free UK calls, USB charging, wayfinding assistance, emergency services button and other digital services
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- utilities-energy
- Inspector
- N Teasdale
- Postcode
- N19 3PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Mercers Road/Tavistock Terrace Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on public safety
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area setting, which substantial weight must be given to under the Framework, was not outweighed by the substantial benefits of improved telecommunications infrastructure.
The substantial benefits of telecommunications infrastructure and connectivity were outweighed by the substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, to which considerable importance and weight must be given under Policies HE4 and HE6 of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D3Policy D4Policy HC1Policy T2Policy T4Policy PLAN1Policy DH1Policy DH2Policy ST3Policy DH6Policy T1
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Islington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed10 July 20266007719Hornsey Road, Outside No. 219, London, N7 7QY
- Dismissed1 November 20233311303Pavement at Junction of Highbury Place and Highbury Corner, St Paul's Road, London, N1 2LF
- Allowed22 October 20266006605131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
- Allowed16 October 2026600593030 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
- Allowed24 September 20266005904Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®