Planning appeal decision
Land Between 191 and 234 Nottingham Road, Selston, Nottingham, NG16 6BT
Planning appeal 6008160 at Land Between 191 and 234 Nottingham Road, Selston, Nottingham, NG16 6BT (Ashfield) was dismissed on 8 September 2026 by Inspector Paul Thompson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Major outline planning application for 42 dwellings with access, layout and scale fixed and all other matters reserved
- Authority
- Ashfield
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Paul Thompson
- Postcode
- NG16 6BT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the impact of the proposal on protected species and their habitats, including through any effects to the Selston Common Grassland Local Wildlife Site
- whether the proposal would provide safe and suitable access to the site for all users
- whether the proposal could be made safe from flooding throughout its lifetime without increasing risk elsewhere, having regard to the proposed Sustainable Drainage System
- the effect of the proposal on archaeological remains within the site
- the effect of the proposal on the significance of other Non-Designated Heritage Assets, through development within their setting(s)
What decided it
The cumulative effect of significant adverse impacts on character and appearance, protected species and habitats, highway safety, flood risk and drainage, and unresolved archaeological concerns substantially outweighed the moderate housing and economic benefits.
The adverse effects on character and appearance, highway safety, biodiversity, flood risk and archaeology were of such magnitude that they substantially outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and economic activity, requiring dismissal under Framework Policy S4.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- ALPR Policy HG5ALPR Policy ST1ALPR Policy EV6ALPR Policy EV2ALPR Policy EV4
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Ashfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed30 December 202533738642 The Hill, Kirkby-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 8JR
- Allowed20 October 202533668254 Hollinwell Close, Kirkby-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 8NE
- Dismissed29 August 202533676588 Cedar Close, Skegby, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3FG
- Dismissed16 April 202533596904 Cowpasture Lane, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 5AF
- Allowed2 April 2025335901753, Montague Road, Hucknall, Nottingham, NG15 7DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®