Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20266008451

251 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Walsall, B74 2DX

Planning appeal 6008451 at 251 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Walsall, B74 2DX (Walsall) was dismissed on 11 August 2026 by Inspector N Bromley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by any public benefits of the proposal.

erection of a convenience store with associated car parking, landscaping and servicing and plant areas utilising the existing access

Authority
Walsall
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
retail
Inspector
N Bromley
Postcode
B74 2DX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by any public benefits of the proposal
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would accord with local and national planning policies with regard to the sequential test for retail development
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness, and the identified benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm, so very special circumstances do not exist.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was outweighed by public benefits including retail provision and job creation; however, the substantial harm to Green Belt openness arising from inappropriate development was not outweighed by the identified benefits, and very special circumstances were not established.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV2 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011Policy CSP2 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011Policy CEN7 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011Policy GP2 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan 2005Policy ENV32 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan 2005Policy S6 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan 2005Policy S7 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan 2005Policy GB1 of the Walsall Site Allocation Document 2019Policy EN5 of the Walsall Site Allocation Document 2019
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 91Paragraph 92Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

37 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Walsall

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266012207
    Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
  2. Notice varied and upheld20 February 20263344208
    National Car Hub, Land Situated to the South and East of Back Lane, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 0LS
  3. Allowed9 December 20253334991
    Paddock Land Corner Of Beacon Road, Bridle Lane, Walsall, Streetly, WS9 0RG
  4. Allowed9 May 20253358297
    197 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Sutton Coldfield, B74 3YR
  5. Dismissed26 March 20253350197
    Oak House, Cedar Court, Walsall Wood Road, Walsall, WS9 8QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.