Planning appeal decision
Dovecot Avenue Sw, Dovecot Avenue / Pilch Lane, Dovecot, L14 7QH
Planning appeal 6009085 at Dovecot Avenue Sw, Dovecot Avenue / Pilch Lane, Dovecot, L14 7QH (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 17 August 2026 by Inspector K Mee, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
an EE/H3G valmont 20m high phase 7 MK2 streetworks pole on root foundation and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- Liverpool City Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- telecoms
- Inspector
- K Mee
- Postcode
- L14 7QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on nearby trees
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of the existing occupiers at 123 Pilch Lane
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on highway safety
- if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any alternative provision
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to character and appearance, nearby trees and highway safety, which was not outweighed by the need for the installation given that less harmful alternatives had not been properly explored.
The need for the proposed installation weighed in favour of the appeal, but this was not sufficient to outweigh the identified harms to character and appearance, nearby trees and highway safety.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STP4Policy GI 9Policy H7Policy TP1Policy TP3Policy TP4Policy TP5Policy TP6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 122
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Liverpool City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed19 October 20266010482Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ
- Allowed9 October 20266010480Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ
- Dismissed8 October 20266010521Seeds Lane, Orrell Park, Liverpool, L9 0PG
- Allowed10 September 20266009242Pavement O/S Esso, East Lancashire Road, Liverpool, L11 2FT
- Allowed10 September 20266009241Pavement O/S Esso, East Lancashire Road, Liverpool, L11 2FT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®