Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 August 20266009100

1 Cleeve Road, Middle Littleton, Eversham, WR11 8JT

erection of two 2-bedroom, detached bungalow dwellings, with parking, gardens and associated infrastructure at the rear of 1 Cleeve Road (No. 1A has been designed as a disabled-friendly property with accessibility in mind)

Authority
Wychavon
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WR11 8JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the development is acceptable having regard to the Council's adopted development strategy
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No 2, with particular regard to outlook from their rear garden
  • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal is acceptable with respect to its impact on protected and other species
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether the proposed site access is acceptable with respect to highway safety
  • whether the proposal makes suitable provision for achieving biodiversity net gain
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The conflict with the Council's adopted development strategy under Policy SWDPR 03, combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions and undemonstrated acceptability regarding protected species, outweighed the moderate housing and economic benefits, particularly given the Council's ability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and modest economic and social benefits were outweighed by considerable weight given to conflict with the development plan strategy, considerable weight given to unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, and considerable weight given to the failure to demonstrate acceptability regarding protected species.

Framework references: 11, 220

Plan policies cited: Policy SWDPR03 part D, Policy SWDPR 03, Policy SWDPR 35, Policy SWDPR 28, Policy SWDPR 01, Policy SWDPR 29, Policy SWDPR3 (E), Policy SWDPR33, Policy SWDPR 6, Policy SWDPR 30, Policy SWDPR 19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.