Planning appeal decision
1 Cleeve Road, Middle Littleton, Eversham, WR11 8JT
Planning appeal 6009100 at 1 Cleeve Road, Middle Littleton, Eversham, WR11 8JT (Wychavon) was dismissed on 5 August 2026 by Inspector R Hall, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location of the development is acceptable having regard to the Council's adopted development strategy.
erection of two 2-bedroom, detached bungalow dwellings, with parking, gardens and associated infrastructure at the rear of 1 Cleeve Road (No. 1A has been designed as a disabled-friendly property with accessibility in mind)
- Authority
- Wychavon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- R Hall
- Postcode
- WR11 8JT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the location of the development is acceptable having regard to the Council's adopted development strategy
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No 2, with particular regard to outlook from their rear garden
- whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal is acceptable with respect to its impact on protected and other species
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether the proposed site access is acceptable with respect to highway safety
- whether the proposal makes suitable provision for achieving biodiversity net gain
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing
What decided it
The conflict with the Council's adopted development strategy under Policy SWDPR 03, combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions and undemonstrated acceptability regarding protected species, outweighed the moderate housing and economic benefits, particularly given the Council's ability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and modest economic and social benefits were outweighed by considerable weight given to conflict with the development plan strategy, considerable weight given to unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, and considerable weight given to the failure to demonstrate acceptability regarding protected species.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SWDPR03 part DPolicy SWDPR 03Policy SWDPR 35Policy SWDPR 28Policy SWDPR 01Policy SWDPR 29Policy SWDPR3 (E)Policy SWDPR33Policy SWDPR 6Policy SWDPR 30Policy SWDPR 19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 220
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed26 October 20266013639Agricultural Building at Beckford Poultry Farm, Ashton Road, Beckford, GL20 7AU
- Dismissed15 October 20266013381The Old Winery, Boston Lane, Charlton, WR11 2RD
- Dismissed15 October 20266009293Land at OS96484749, Haines Avenue, Wyre Piddle, WR10 2RQ
- Dismissed13 October 202660143142 Fladbury Villas, Fladbury, WR10 2QP
- Dismissed29 September 20266009011The Geldings, Bouts Lane, Holberrow Green, Inkberrow, Redditch, B96 6JX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®