Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20266009476

Pavement o/s, 956 Brighton Road, Croydon, London, CR8 2LP

the installation of a multifunctional communication Hub including defibrillator and advertisement display. Appeal B:

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
telecoms
Postcode
CR8 2LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed development on amenity, with particular regard to the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The visually intrusive and dominant character of the illuminated screen, which would undermine the historic character of the area and cause minor harm to non-designated heritage assets, outweighed the modest public benefits of the development.

the modest public benefits of the hub (defibrillator, free services, economic benefit) did not outweigh the serious harm to character and appearance and minor harm to heritage assets

Plan policies cited: SP4, DM12, DM18, D8 of the London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.