Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 October 20266009699

28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA

Planning appeal 6009699 at 28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 16 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: effects of the proposed development on the housing mix of the area in relation to the conversion of the single dwelling into flats.

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
SW2 3AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effects of the proposed development on the housing mix of the area in relation to the conversion of the single dwelling into flats
  • living conditions of occupiers of the upper flat, in relation to external amenity space
  • local transport network
  • character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the conservation area

What decided it

The permanent loss of a family-sized dwelling for which there is an identified need, combined with the lack of external amenity space for the upper flat and the absence of a s.106 agreement to mitigate transport impacts, substantially outweighed the modest benefits of energy efficiency improvements.

applying NPPF S4, the adverse effects of the conversion substantially outweighed the benefits of providing homes, as substantial weight was given to the identified need for family-sized dwellings and the harm caused by their loss; the modest energy efficiency benefits did not outweigh the identified harms

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H3Policy H6Policy H1Policy D6Policy H5Policy T1Policy T6Policy T4Policy T5Policy D4Policy T3Policy Q5Policy Q11Policy Q22

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

492 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  3. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed29 June 20266009735
    94 Knollys Road, Lambeth, London, SW16 2JX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.