Planning appeal decision
Pine Lodge, Chilworth Drove, Chilworth, SO16 7JH
Planning appeal 6009745 at Pine Lodge, Chilworth Drove, Chilworth, SO16 7JH (Test Valley) was dismissed on 17 August 2026 by Inspector S Leonard, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a new dwelling, having regard to the Council's adopted spatial settlement policy and the accessibility of the site to facilities and services.
4 bed dwelling and carport
- Authority
- Test Valley
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- S Leonard
- Postcode
- SO16 7JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a new dwelling, having regard to the Council's adopted spatial settlement policy and the accessibility of the site to facilities and services
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Pine Lodge and the future occupiers of the appeal scheme, having particular regard to privacy
- The effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Solent and Southampton Water and New Forest Special Protection Areas (SPAs), having regard to additional nitrates and increased recreational pressure
What decided it
The appeal site is not a suitable location for new housing development because it lies outside the settlement boundary in countryside where no exceptions apply, and future occupiers would lack genuine choice of transport modes other than the private car, conflicting with both the development plan spatial strategy and Framework sustainability objectives.
The modest benefits of housing supply and family housing contribution were afforded moderate positive weight, but the significant harms from conflict with spatial settlement policy, inaccessibility to facilities and services, and material harm to character and appearance substantially and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy COM2Policy E1Policy E2Policy LHW4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 73
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Test Valley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed26 October 20266012951Barn South Of Former Poultry Houses, Monxton Road, Grateley, SP11 8JG
- Notice upheld21 September 20263354723Hillside Nurseries , Branches Lane the Banks, Lockerely , Hants, SO51 6JT
- Notice upheld21 September 20263354722Hillside Nurseries , Branches Lane the Banks, Lockerely , Hants, SO51 6JT
- Dismissed3 September 20266008234Landfall Annexe, Landfall, Chilworth Road, Chilworth,Romsey, SO16 7LA
- Allowed31 July 20266003991Cyma House, Village Street, Chilbolton, SO20 6BA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®