Planning appeal decision
Glebelands Field, Lodge Lane, Bolney, RH17 5RR
Planning appeal 6009838 at Glebelands Field, Lodge Lane, Bolney, RH17 5RR (Mid Sussex) was dismissed on 16 September 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be a suitable location for the land use proposed, having regard to the development plan strategy, access to services and facilities and the Framework.
a phased development of up to 9 self build dwellings
- Authority
- Mid Sussex
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- A Wright
- Postcode
- RH17 5RR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site would be a suitable location for the land use proposed, having regard to the development plan strategy, access to services and facilities and the Framework
- the effect of the proposed location, land use and amount of development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed location, land use and amount of development on the significance of designated heritage assets
What decided it
The site is not physically well-related to the existing settlement and would not meet the criteria for development outside settlements under Policy S5 of the Framework, combined with the harm to character and heritage significance which would not be outweighed by the housing benefits.
the benefits of nine dwellings towards housing supply (given substantial weight) and limited economic benefits did not substantially outweigh the adverse effects of unsustainable location, harm to character and appearance, and failure to preserve heritage asset significance, such that no exceptional circumstances existed to justify approval under Policy S5
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP6Policy DP15Policy DP21Policy DP12Policy DP26Policy DP34Policy DP35Policy BOLBB1Policy BOLE2Policy BOLD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy S5Policy HE6Policy HO7
- Judgments
- Corbett v Cornwall Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1069
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed16 June 20266002763Woodcote, Yew Lane, East Grinstead, RH19 2AZ
- Allowed20 April 20263373757Land At Gibbshaven Farm, North Of Felbridge Road, Furnace Wood , West Sussex, RH19 2SJ
- Dismissed30 March 20266002280Floran Farm, Hophurst Hill, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4LP
- Dismissed13 February 20263373346Land at White Lodge, Ockley Lane, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, RH15 0BP
- Dismissed7 November 20253368572The Croft, Holtye Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex, RH19 3QF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®