Planning appeal decision
Land Adj Langley Cricket Club, Cock Hall Lane, Langley, Macclesfield, SK11 0DE
Planning appeal 6010253 at Land Adj Langley Cricket Club, Cock Hall Lane, Langley, Macclesfield, SK11 0DE (Cheshire East Council) was dismissed on 28 September 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location and proposed land use, in relation to: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect on openness; whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities; and if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances.
one dwelling and associated development
- Authority
- Cheshire East Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- SK11 0DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location and proposed land use, in relation to: whether the proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect on openness; whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities; and if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The appeal site would not occupy a sustainable location due to its physical separation from the village, poor accessibility to services and facilities, and lack of safe pedestrian/cycling routes, combined with significant harm to Green Belt openness, which was not clearly outweighed by the housing land supply shortfall and other benefits.
the significant benefits of housing delivery and efficient land use did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the unsuitability of the location due to poor accessibility and reliance on private car use
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG 3Policy SD 1Policy SD 2Policy MP 1Policy CO 1Table 9.1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy TR3Policy GB6
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed13 October 20266009638The Smithy, Adlington Road, Wilmslow, SK9 2LN
- Allowed5 October 20266008576Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
- Allowed2 October 20266010578Land at Dunvilles Farm, Bollington Lane, Chelford Road, Monks Heath, Macclesfield, SK10 4UL
- Dismissed30 September 20266010213Disley Meadow, Lower Greenshall Lane, Disley, SK12 2HH
- Allowed30 September 20266008176Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®