Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 October 20266010388

163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ

Planning appeal 6010388 at 163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ (Richmond upon Thames) was dismissed on 20 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the condition is reasonable and necessary in regard to parking provision in the area and highway safety.

change of use of ground, first and second floors from B1 (a) offices – C3 residential (21 flats together with 21 off-street parking spaces, 21 cycle spaces and two bin and recycling store area) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 16/1935/GPD15, dated 4 July 2016

Appeal type
major · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
TW12 1BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the condition is reasonable and necessary in regard to parking provision in the area and highway safety

What decided it

The parking stress survey was insufficiently evidenced to demonstrate that loss of the six parking spaces would not result in adverse effects on parking provision and highway safety, particularly given the mixed-use commercial character of the area and the survey's own acknowledgment that additional surveys should be carried out in such locations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021Policies 47 and 48 of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan (2024-2039)
Judgments
Pressland v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2016] EWHC 1763 (Admin); Finney v Welsh Ministers & Others [2019] EWCA 1868; RSBS Developments Ltd v SSHCLG & LB Brent [2020] EWHC 3077 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

396 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  2. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  3. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  4. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD
  5. Allowed6 May 20266001253
    130 Fairfax Road, Teddington, TW11 9BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.