Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20266010391

285 High Road Leyton, Leyton, E10 5QN

Planning appeal 6010391 at 285 High Road Leyton, Leyton, E10 5QN (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 September 2026 by Inspector L Gardner, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, and whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Leyton Town Centre Conservation Area.

Construction of single storey side and rear extensions to the ground floor commercial unit together with a new glazed shopfront, side access doors, boundary treatment and provision of bin storage

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
retail
Inspector
L Gardner
Postcode
E10 5QN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area, and whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Leyton Town Centre Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision towards biodiversity

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area, which would fail to preserve or enhance its character or appearance, substantially outweighed the modest economic benefits of the proposal.

The economic benefits of approving the development were substantially outweighed by the adverse effects arising from failure to comply with heritage and design policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 45Policy 53Policy 72Policy D4Policy HC1Policy G6Policy 79

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

443 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.