Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 August 20266010844

Footpath outside 366 Gray’s Inn Road, London, WC1X 8BE

installation of new BT Street Hub and associated display of advertisement panels on either side of the unit

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
utilities-energy
Postcode
WC1X 8BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the significance of the Kings Cross/St Pancras Conservation Area and the Grade II Listed Building, 356-364 Gray's Inn Road through development within its setting
  • whether the proposal would achieve an appropriate level of community safety at the locality
  • the effect of the proposal on pedestrian safety

What decided it

The less than substantial but considerable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, combined with the failure to achieve appropriate community safety, outweighed the public benefits of the proposal.

The less than substantial harm to the Kings Cross/St Pancras Conservation Area and the setting of Willing House, together with the failure to achieve appropriate community safety, was not outweighed by the public benefits of improved connectivity and emergency services.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy D4, Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy C5, Policy T1, Policy G1, Policy A1, Policy C6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.