®Planning appeal decision
Footpath Outside 366 Gray’s Inn Road, London, WC1X 8BE
Planning appeal 6010845 at Footpath Outside 366 Gray’s Inn Road, London, WC1X 8BE (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 17 August 2026 by Inspector C Skelly, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the significance of the Kings Cross/St Pancras Conservation Area and the Grade II Listed Building, 356-364 Gray's Inn Road through development within its setting.
installation of new BT Street Hub and associated display of advertisement panels on either side of the unit
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- advert · Commercial advertisement
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- utilities-energy
- Inspector
- C Skelly
- Postcode
- WC1X 8BE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the significance of the Kings Cross/St Pancras Conservation Area and the Grade II Listed Building, 356-364 Gray's Inn Road through development within its setting
- whether the proposal would achieve an appropriate level of community safety at the locality
- the effect of the proposal on pedestrian safety
What decided it
The less than substantial but considerable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, combined with the failure to achieve appropriate community safety, outweighed the public benefits of the proposal.
The less than substantial harm to the Kings Cross/St Pancras Conservation Area and the setting of Willing House, together with the failure to achieve appropriate community safety, was not outweighed by the public benefits of improved connectivity and emergency services.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D4Policy D1Policy D2Policy C5Policy T1Policy G1Policy A1Policy C6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed12 October 20266007435Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
- Allowed12 October 20266007299Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
- Dismissed10 September 20266010353Footpath Outside 3 Millbrook Place, London, NW1 2JA
- Dismissed10 September 20266010352Footpath Outside 3 Millbrook Place, London, NW1 2JA
- Dismissed10 September 20266007600Footpath Outside 9 - 17 Highgate Road, London, NW5 1JY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.