Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 August 20266010864

Section of Footpath Adjacent to 85 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 2FU

Planning appeal 6010864 at Section of Footpath Adjacent to 85 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 2FU (London Borough of Wandsworth) was dismissed on 25 August 2026 by Inspector Les Greenwood, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects on the amenity of the local area in terms of both visual character and physical convenience.

Installation of 1No BT Street Hub Unit and associated advertisement panels on either side of the unit

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
telecoms
Inspector
Les Greenwood
Postcode
SW15 2FU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects on the amenity of the local area in terms of both visual character and physical convenience
  • The safety of public highway users

What decided it

The adverse effect on amenity caused by the poorly sited proposals substantially outweighed the telecommunications benefits.

The telecommunications benefits of the unit, including emergency calls, telephone and internet services, and potential environmental monitoring and community uses, were substantially outweighed by the adverse effect on amenity of the poorly sited proposals.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Wandsworth Local Plan 2023-2038 Policy LP1Wandsworth Local Plan 2023-2038 Policy LP9Wandsworth Local Plan 2023-2038 Policy LP22Wandsworth Local Plan 2023-2038 Policy LP49Wandsworth Local Plan 2023-2038 Policy LP50London Plan 2021 Policy D8London Plan 2021 Policy T2
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy S4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

511 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed25 August 20266011686
    Section of Footpath Adjacent to 85 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 2FU
  2. Dismissed6 January 20263364579
    Land Outside 171 Balham High Rd, , London, SW12 9AY
  3. Dismissed6 January 20263364578
    Land Outside 171 Balham High Rd, , London, SW12 9AY
  4. Allowed27 June 20253352566
    Land Outside 4 Keswick Rd, London, SW15 2RB
  5. Allowed27 December 20243347143
    Tooting Common Depot, Dr Johnson Avenue, Balham, London, SW17 8JU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.