Planning appeal decision
Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
Planning appeal 6011079 at Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL (Mid Sussex) was dismissed on 10 September 2026 by Inspector A Wright, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities.
Full application for a proposed 5 pitch settled Gypsy accommodation site including vehicular access permitted under DM/20/1277; revised application dealing with residual ecology and arboricultural matters further to appeal ref: APP/D3830/W/25/3362298
- Authority
- Mid Sussex
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- gypsy-gypsy
- Inspector
- A Wright
- Postcode
- RH17 5AL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to policies concerned with development in areas at risk of flooding
What decided it
The site's unsuitability due to poor accessibility to services and facilities combined with unresolved flood risk and drainage concerns, which together outweighed the significant benefits of addressing the evidenced shortfall in Gypsy and Traveller pitch provision.
The benefits of addressing the evidenced unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches and the equality implications (weight of high order) did not substantially outweigh the adverse effects of poor accessibility to services and facilities and unresolved flood risk (very important matters weighing against the proposal), such that the exceptional circumstances required by Policy S5(4) of the Framework did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP33Policy DP21Policy DP41
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld6 July 20263376721Land Fir Trees Place, Turners Hill Road, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HQ
- Dismissed30 April 20266002774Rocklands, Church Lane, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6UP
- Allowed16 September 20253363187Land Adjacent to Hilgay Cottage , Birchwood Grove, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
- Allowed20 August 20253366246Firs Farm, Copthorne Common, Copthorne, West Sussex, RH10 3LF
- Allowed21 July 20253358882Floran Farm, Hophurst Hill, Crawley Down, RH10 4LP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®