Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent To Salisbury Cottages, Unnamed Road From Salisbury Street To Salisbury Cottages, Hadfield, Glossop, SK13 1NN
Planning appeal 6011421 at Land Adjacent To Salisbury Cottages, Unnamed Road From Salisbury Street To Salisbury Cottages, Hadfield, Glossop, SK13 1NN (High Peak) was dismissed on 21 September 2026 by Inspector J Buxton, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and overlooking.
Proposed detached dwelling
- Authority
- High Peak
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- J Buxton
- Postcode
- SK13 1NN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and overlooking
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to private amenity space
- whether sufficient information has been provided to demonstrate compliance with biodiversity net gain requirements
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
What decided it
The unacceptable overlooking and loss of privacy for neighbouring occupiers and the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, combined with insufficient biodiversity net gain information, outweighed the benefits of providing an additional dwelling.
Substantial weight was given to the benefits of providing an additional dwelling and effective use of land, but greater weight was attached to the identified conflict with the development plan regarding privacy, external amenity space, and biodiversity net gain, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EQ6Policy L2(1)(d)(ii)Policy DP3Policy S1Policy EQ5Policy S4Policy L3
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in High Peak
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed5 October 20266013259Shady Oak Inn, Long Hill, Fernilee, SK23 7HD
- Allowed30 September 20266009410Land Rear Of 53 Beresford Avenue., Chapel-en-le-Frith, SK23 0PZ
- Allowed21 September 2026601031115 Compton Road, Buxton, SK17 9DN
- Dismissed4 September 20266011027The Rising Rest Home, Primrose Lane, Simmondley, Glossop, SK13 6LW
- Allowed28 August 2026601263432 Brookside Road, Chapel-en-le-Frith, SK23 0NE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®