Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 September 20266011804

3, Herbert Road, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8JR

Planning appeal 6011804 at 3, Herbert Road, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 8JR (Walsall) was allowed on 1 September 2026 by Inspector Andrew Fuller, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area.

First-floor side and rear extensions above the existing ground-floor footprint, formation of a rear dormer and installation of front rooflights, removal of chimney, and associated external and internal alterations

Authority
Walsall
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Andrew Fuller
Postcode
WS9 8JR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy, sunlight, and daylight

What decided it

The proposed extension, being set back from the front elevation, set lower than the main ridge line, and incorporating a flat roof design towards the neighbouring boundary, would not cause unacceptable harm to character and appearance or to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GP2 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan (Saved policies) (2005)Policy ENV32 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan (Saved policies) (2005)Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy (2011)Policy ENV2 of the Black Country Core Strategy (2011)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Walsall

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266008716
    Rooftop Food Court, Multi-Storey Car Park, George St, Walsall, Ws1 1RS
  2. Dismissed9 October 20266012207
    Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
  3. Allowed8 October 20266012149
    225, Lichfield Road, Rushall, WS4 1EA
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266013877
    57, Lincoln Road, Walsall, WS1 2DW
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266008378
    407 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.