Planning appeal decision
Grassed Verge of Carmel Road North, Cockerton, Darlington, DL3 8NN
Planning appeal 6011909 at Grassed Verge of Carmel Road North, Cockerton, Darlington, DL3 8NN (Darlington) was dismissed on 6 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
the installation of a 20m high slim-line monopole, supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. transmission dishes, along with 2 no. equipment cabinets and ancillary development thereto including 3 no. Ericsson Radio Systems (ERS’s)
- Authority
- Darlington
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- telecoms
- Postcode
- DL3 8NN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to outlook
- if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The proposal would result in substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, and the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that there were no other alternative sites that could meet the requirements within the search area, such that the benefits would be substantially outweighed by the adverse effects when assessed against Framework policies CO1(1)(b) and DP3(1).
applying Framework policy S4, the benefits of the proposal in maintaining and improving network coverage, capacity, reliability and resilience would be substantially outweighed by the adverse effects of harm to the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, when assessed against the national decision-making policies in the Framework, particularly policies CO1(1)(b) and DP3(1).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy IN7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Darlington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed23 September 20266011290115 North Road, Darlington, DL1 2PS
- Dismissed13 August 20266004841Pavement Outside Santander, Bondgate, Darlington, DL3 7JB
- Dismissed13 August 20266004840Pavement Outside 4 Northgate, Darlington, DL1 1NR
- Dismissed13 August 20266004837Pavement Outside 41 - 45 Northgate, Darlington, DL1 1TR
- Dismissed13 August 20266004835Pavement Outside 38 Northgate, Darlington, DL1 1PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®