Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20266012024

124 Ferrars Road, Sheffield, S9 1SA

Planning appeal 6012024 at 124 Ferrars Road, Sheffield, S9 1SA (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 3 September 2026 by Inspector Andrew Dale, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed extension upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the terraced host property, with particular reference to the provision of private outdoor amenity space.

Single storey rear extension with WC/shower for disability use

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Andrew Dale
Postcode
S9 1SA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed extension upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the terraced host property, with particular reference to the provision of private outdoor amenity space
  • its effect upon the residential amenity of the neighbouring dwellings at 122 and 126 Ferrars Road, with particular regard to the potential for loss of daylight, sunlight, outlook and privacy

What decided it

The harm caused to the residential amenity of the neighbouring dwellings at 122 and 126 Ferrars Road through loss of daylight, sunlight, outlook and privacy outweighs the proposal's benefits in meeting the needs of a family member with disabilities.

the harm to the residential amenity of neighbouring dwellings outweighs the proposal's benefits in terms of meeting the disability-related needs of a family member

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS 74 of the Sheffield Core Strategy 2009Policy H14 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998Policy BE5 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan 1998

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014327
    4 Struan Road, Sheffield, S7 2EH
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014347
    Advertising Right Adjacent Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
  4. Allowed16 October 20266014719
    1 Twickenham Court, Halfway, Sheffield, S20 4HT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266012829
    189 Crimicar Lane, Sheffield, S10 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.