Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted27 July 20223180565

Bmc (Babul Murad Centre) - 852A-C and Rear of 852, Harrow Road, Wembley, Middlesex, HA0 2PX

Planning appeal 3180565 at Bmc (Babul Murad Centre) - 852A-C and Rear of 852, Harrow Road, Wembley, Middlesex, HA0 2PX (London Borough of Brent) was allowed on 27 July 2022 by Inspector Harbottle M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

Material change of use of the premises to a mixed use as residential and community centre/place of worship, and erection of floodlights, a flag/flagpole and signage

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
community-institutional · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harbottle M
Postcode
HA0 2PX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of nearby residents.
  • The effect of the development on the highway network, including the adequacy of on-site parking provision.

What decided it

The DPA's restriction of the use to twice-daily prayers for no more than 30 people with no outdoor events meant it avoided the harm to character, living conditions and highway safety associated with the wider mixed use that existed when the notice was issued.

The restricted Mosque use, secured by the unilateral undertaking and planning conditions, was found to accord with the development plan and avoid harm to character, living conditions and the highway network, so the appeal succeeded on ground (a) without need for a broader tilted balance exercise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BT2Policy BSI1London Plan Policy S1London Plan Policy GC1London Plan Policy H1London Plan Policy H2Policy BH1Policy BH2Policy BH4
Judgments
R (oao Davison) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2019] EWHC 1409 (Admin); R (oao Bates) v Maldon District Council [2019] EWCA Civ 1272

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

391 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  3. Notice upheld24 September 20263365164
    Land and Garage, Rear of 21 Ivy Road and Adjacent to 31 Cedar Road, London, NW2 6SN
  4. Split Decision17 September 20263357462
    61 Alder Grove, London, NW2 7DE
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.