Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld17 November 20213194580

Land at Willow Farm (Field 3116), Jackets Lane, Harefield, Northwood, Middlesex, UB9 6PZ

Planning appeal 3194580 at Land at Willow Farm (Field 3116), Jackets Lane, Harefield, Northwood, Middlesex, UB9 6PZ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 17 November 2021 by Inspector Lewis D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.

Without planning permission the material change of use of the Land to a residential use and associated operational development

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Lewis D
Postcode
UB9 6PZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • The performance of the site against criteria in Policy DMH 9 and Policy H3
  • The existing level of local provision and need for sites within the Borough and more widely
  • The availability (or lack) of alternative accommodation for the proposed site residents
  • Personal circumstances of the proposed site residents
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm resulting from the proposal, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.
  • Whether the compliance period of three months is reasonable and proportionate

What decided it

The substantial and significant Green Belt and landscape harms were not clearly outweighed by the need and personal circumstances relied upon, so very special circumstances did not exist under any permanent, temporary or personal permission option.

The substantial harm from inappropriateness, together with harm to openness, encroachment and landscape character, was not clearly outweighed by the limited/moderate weight given to need and the significant weight given to personal circumstances, so the balance tipped against the proposal and very special circumstances did not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H14Policy DMH 9Policy H3Policy G2Policy EM2Policy DMEI 4
Judgments
Mulvenna and Smith v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Hyndburn Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1850

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

100 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld29 September 20263348967
    65 Blunts Avenue, Sipson, West Drayton, UB7 0DS
  2. Notice varied and upheld22 September 20263363255
    2 Milton Close, Hayes, UB4 0DE
  3. Notice varied and upheld22 September 20263363247
    2 Milton Close, Hayes, UB4 0DE
  4. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  5. Notice varied and upheld11 September 20263359383
    Land at 7 Waverley Close, Hayes, UB3 4AJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.