Planning appeal decision
The Land at Rambling Rose, Off Southampton Road, Clarendon, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP5 3DG
Planning appeal 3225770 at The Land at Rambling Rose, Off Southampton Road, Clarendon, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP5 3DG (Wiltshire Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 27 May 2022 by Inspector Kean G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Barn had the characteristics of a dwelling, when its change of use as a dwelling began and whether it has been used as such continuously for 4 years.
Without planning permission, the material change of use of Land from agriculture to a mixed use of agriculture and residential purposes
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Kean G
- Postcode
- SP5 3DG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Barn had the characteristics of a dwelling, when its change of use as a dwelling began and whether it has been used as such continuously for 4 years
- If those conditions are met, whether the residential use of the Barn may yet be enforced against on public policy grounds, in light of what the Council alleges to be the appellant's deception as to its true use
What decided it
The appellant established continuous residential use of the Barn as a single dwelling for at least 4 years before the notice was issued, and the alleged deception (concerning the separate Twin Unit) was found not to be directly intended to undermine the immunity claim for the Barn, so the Welwyn principle did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Gravesham BC v SSE & O’Brien [1983] JPL 306; Grendon v The First Secretary of State and Cotswold DC [2006] EWHC 1711 (Admin); London Borough of Islington v SSCLG and Maxwell Estates Limited [2019] EWHC 2691; Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another (Respondents) v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 15; Jackson v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Bonsall v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWCA Civ 1246; Massingham v Secretary of State for Local Government Transport and the Regions [2002] EWHC 1578 (Admin); Andrew Blackburn v First Secretary of State, South Holland District Council [2003] EWHC 671 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wiltshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed21 October 20266009637The Stables, Doctors Hill, Corsham, SN13 8AT
- Notice upheld28 July 20263357040The Banks , Lyneham , Wiltshire, SN15 4NT
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 June 20263357357Red Lion, Axford, Marlborough, SN8 2HA
- Notice upheld29 June 20263348384Three Crowns, Whaddon, Salisbury, SP5 3HB
- Allowed23 June 20266006895Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®