Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld4 July 20223228965

98 Hilda Road, Canning Town, LONDON, E16 4NN

without planning permission, the material change of use to a sui generis house in multiple occupation (HMO)

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Fleming D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the stock of family houses in the borough
  • The living conditions of the existing occupiers, having regard to the standard of accommodation
  • The living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, having regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The large HMO use results in material harm to the stock of family housing in the borough and provides substandard accommodation with insufficient communal space, contrary to the development plan policies which prioritise family housing protection and quality.

Plan policies cited: LP Policy H4, LP Policy H3, LP Policy H1, LP Policy S1, LP Policy SP8, LP Policy SP1, LP Policy SP2, The London Plan Policy D4, The London Plan Policy D6, The London Plan Policy GG4, The London Plan Policy D14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.