Planning appeal decision
Adjacent to 118 Kneller Road, Twickenham, TW2 7DX
Planning appeal 3234402 at Adjacent to 118 Kneller Road, Twickenham, TW2 7DX (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 June 2021 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
demolition of the existing salvage yard buildings (sui generis) to provide 8 residential units (comprising 4 dwellings (2x2 and 2x3 bed) and 4 flats (2x2 bed and 2x1 bed) with ground floor flexible commercial space (67.5 sqm GIA) including associated works
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gilbert-Wooldridge T
- Postcode
- TW2 7DX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on parking availability and highway safety in the area
- whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for cycle, refuse and recycling storage
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to outlook, privacy and light
- the effect of the proposed development on the provision of employment floorspace, with particular reference to industrial floorspace
- the effect of the proposed development on the provision of waste management facilities
- whether the proposed development should make appropriate provision for affordable housing
- whether the proposed development would provide an appropriate standard of housing, with particular reference to housing mix, internal space standards, and inclusive access
What decided it
The combined and unresolved harm to character and appearance, parking availability/highway safety, and cycle storage provision outweighed the benefits of the scheme.
the benefits of new housing, affordable housing contribution and site improvement carried significant weight, but were outweighed by the considerable weight given to harm to character and appearance, parking/highway safety, and inadequate cycle storage, tipping the balance towards refusal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP1Policy LP45Policy LP44Policy LP24Policy LP40Policy LP42Policy LP35Policy LP35(A)Policy LP35(E)Policy LP8Policy LP36Policy T6.1Policy T5Policy E2Policy E4Policy E7Policy SI9Policy D6Policy WLWP2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed1 October 202660073901-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
- Dismissed22 July 20266003237Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
- Dismissed14 July 2026600449259-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
- Dismissed7 July 2026601018469 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®