Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted14 July 20223236400

The Land at Land North of Willoughby Drive, Rainham, RM13 7BW

Planning appeal 3236400 at The Land at Land North of Willoughby Drive, Rainham, RM13 7BW (London Borough of Havering) was allowed on 14 July 2022 by Inspector Steen A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development set out in the breach of planning control comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

improvements to York Road and part of Willoughby Drive. Summary

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
minerals-waste · Change of use
Inspector
Steen A
Postcode
RM13 7BW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development set out in the breach of planning control comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether there are other matters that result in additional harm
  • Whether there are other considerations weighing in favour of the development
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, does this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
  • Whether the development comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies (Appeal B)
  • The effect of the development on the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site (Appeal B)

What decided it

In Appeal A the Green Belt harm from inappropriate development was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated; in Appeal B the works were found not to harm Green Belt openness or highway safety, so the appeal succeeded.

Appeal A: substantial weight attributed to Green Belt harm was not clearly outweighed by the considerable weight given to waste-hierarchy/circular economy benefits and the lack of an alternative site, so the balance tipped against the appellant; Appeal B: no Green Belt or highway harm was found to weigh against the proposal, so the balance favoured allowing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DC45Policy G2Policy DC55Policy SI 7Policy CP11Policy W1Policy SI 8Policy SI 9Policy W5Policy DC32Policy DC72Policy T3Policy T4Policy DF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149Paragraph 57
Judgments
Secretary of State for the Environment, Terry Holding v Thurrock Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ. 226; Gestmin v Credit Suisse [2013] EWHC 3560

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

205 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  2. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL
  3. Planning permission granted29 July 20263367840
    5A Myrtle Road, Romford, RM3 8XS
  4. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  5. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.