Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Newell Hall , Warfield Street, Warfield, Bracknell, RG42 6BB
Planning appeal 3245185 at Land Adjacent to Newell Hall , Warfield Street, Warfield, Bracknell, RG42 6BB (Bracknell Forest Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 January 2022 by Inspector Norman R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The principle of the proposed care home and whether the location is appropriate, with particular regard to the open countryside and need.
outline application for the erection of a 45no. bedroom care home (details of access submitted)
- Authority
- Bracknell Forest Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Norman R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The principle of the proposed care home and whether the location is appropriate, with particular regard to the open countryside and need
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding landscape
- Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the setting of the nearby listed buildings
- The effect of the development on the woodland and the impact of the loss of the trees both within the site and the adjacent surroundings
What decided it
The combined harms to landscape character, the setting of the listed Newell Hall, and the loss of trees/woodland outweighed the public benefits of the care home in the ordinary planning balance.
The significant weight given to the provision of 45 care home bedspaces and other economic/social benefits did not outweigh the less-than-substantial heritage harm (mid-point), landscape/character harm and loss of trees, so the ordinary balance tipped against the proposal and the tilted balance was not engaged
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN8Policy H5Policy CS2Policy CS9Policy CS16Policy EN1Policy EN20Policy CS1Policy CS7Policy SA9Policy CS15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Bloor Homes v SSCLG [2014] EWHC 754 (Admin); Suffolk Coastal v Hopkins Homes [2017] UKSC 37; Wavendon v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 1524; Oxton Farm v Harrogate BC [2020] EWCA Civ 805; Peel v SSHCLG [2020] EWCA Civ 1175; Tewkesbury Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities, Housing and Local Government v R Keene & Sons, Robert Hitchins Limited [2019] EWHC 1775 (Admin); City & Country Bramshill Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Hart District Council and Historic England and The National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty [2021] EWCA Civ 320; British Railways Board v Secretary of State for the Environment; Satnam Millenium Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2019] EWHC 2631 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bracknell Forest Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed29 September 20266009377Floringham Lodge, Old Bracknell Lane East, Bracknell, RG12 7AJ
- Allowed13 January 20263365318Land Adjoining Pine Acres, Birch Lane, Ascot, SL5 8RF
- Allowed23 December 20253365026Land South Of Lambrook, Chavey Down Road, Winkfield Row Bracknell, Berkshire, SL4 4QS
- Dismissed17 October 202533688401 Goddard Way, Warfield, Bracknell Forest, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG42 2JR
- Allowed3 September 20253358714Trinity House and The Kebles, Crouch Lane, Winkfield, Windsor, SL4 4TW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®