Planning appeal decision
Land at Boathouse Lane, Parkgate, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 3TD
Planning appeal 3247260 at Land at Boathouse Lane, Parkgate, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 3TD (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 4 June 2021 by Inspector Sturgess M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the creation of a single storey dwelling, partly submerged into the existing site, with associated landscaping and car parking, along with the addition of land available for community use
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sturgess M
- Postcode
- CH64 3TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the location is suitable for a new dwelling
- whether the proposal takes account of its effect on the habitats or species that might be present in the area
- would any harm by reason of inappropriateness or any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight given to the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, which the appellant's arguments concerning design quality, community benefits, energy efficiency and ecological enhancements did not outweigh, and the absence of very special circumstances to justify the development.
Substantial weight was given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness; the benefits advanced by the appellant (design quality, community use, energy efficiency, biodiversity, underground construction, demonstration project potential) were given limited weight and did not outweigh the Green Belt harm or conflict with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT9Policy STRAT1Policy STRAT2Policy STRAT8Policy R1Policy DM19Policy ENV4Policy DM44Policy NNH1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 145Paragraph 146Paragraph 79
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P87]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®