Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld21 June 20213247456

The Plantation Springbottom Lane, Bletchingley, Redhill, RH1 4QZ

Planning appeal 3247456 at The Plantation Springbottom Lane, Bletchingley, Redhill, RH1 4QZ (Tandridge District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 21 June 2021 by Inspector Perrins R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the Green Belt.

without planning permission the making of a material change of use of the land from equestrian to a use for the stationing of residential caravans and touring caravans, with associated residential storage within the existing stable buildings

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Perrins R
Postcode
RH1 4QZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and an Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV)
  • Whether the appeal site is situated within a sustainable location (Appeal A only)
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness combined with significant harm to the AONB/AGLV countryside character outweighed the need, lack of alternative sites and personal circumstances relied upon, so very special circumstances did not exist.

the need for pitches, the lack of alternative sites and the best interests of the children were weighed against the substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant harm to the AONB, AGLV and countryside character, and the Inspector found the harms cumulatively of greater weight so that other considerations did not clearly outweigh the harm and very special circumstances were not established

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP1Policy CSP 20Policy CSP 21Policy CSP 9Policy DP1Policy DP7(10)Policy DP10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 146
Judgments
Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466; Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22; Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630; Braintree DC v SSC&LG & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 Admin; AZ v SSCLG & South Gloucestershire DC [2012] EWHC 3660 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  4. Dismissed23 September 20266008688
    Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266011736
    Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.