Planning appeal decision
Poets Corner Pikes Lane, Crowhurst, Lingfield, RH7 6LX
Planning appeal 3249163 at Poets Corner Pikes Lane, Crowhurst, Lingfield, RH7 6LX (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 7 October 2021 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the outbuilding is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Application for minor amendment to planning permission 2017/211, for alteration to roof shape, removal of roof lights and repositioning of fenestration (retrospective)
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Douglas L
- Postcode
- RH7 6LX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the outbuilding is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the outbuilding on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the outbuilding on the character and appearance of the area
- if the outbuilding does constitute inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to allow the appeal
What decided it
The outbuilding constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and significant harm to character and appearance, with no very special circumstances identified to justify approval.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with significant harm to character and appearance, was not outweighed by the moderate weight given to the fallback position of the Approved Scheme or any other considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP14Policy DP7Policy CSP18
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®