Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 July 20213249560

87 Hamilton Terrace, London, NW8 9QX

Planning appeal 3249560 at 87 Hamilton Terrace, London, NW8 9QX (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 5 July 2021 by Inspector Miell C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St John's Wood Conservation Area.

follows “The Application proposes a new extension on the northern (side) elevation of 87 Hamilton Terrace (the ‘Site’) which will replace the existing two-storey store room and study with a new two-storey extension which incorporates a studio space, play room and bedroom with en-suite facilities

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Miell C
Postcode
NW8 9QX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St John's Wood Conservation Area

What decided it

The realistic prospect of damage to protected trees that contribute positively to the conservation area's character, combined with insufficient pre-permission mitigation detail and modest public benefits, meant the proposal could not be concluded to preserve or enhance the conservation area.

The modest public benefits of improved accommodation for occupiers and enhanced appearance of the extension were outweighed by the risk of harm to the significance of the conservation area through potential loss or damage to protected trees

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 34 of the WCP 2019Policy 39 of the WCP 2019Policy 40 of the WCP 2019
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 193Paragraph 194Paragraph 196

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 757 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266009920
    25 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014604
    South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
  4. Dismissed21 October 20266012002
    Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
  5. Allowed21 October 20266011405
    17 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.