Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20213249966

Pond Cottage, 77 Redehall Road, Smallfield, Surrey, RH6 9QA

for the conversion of the attached triple garage on the side of the house and the reconstruction of an existing adjacent covered patio area at the rear

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
RH6 9QA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Metropolitan Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development was not clearly outweighed by the personal benefits to the appellant, and very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and material harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the personal benefits of homeworking and gym facilities, tipping decisively against the proposal.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149, 151, 138

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.